YBIT vs. BTCZ
YBIT (YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YBIT returned -36.59% vs 60.52% for BTCZ. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. YBIT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
YBIT vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBIT achieves a -26.82% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 39.90% return.
YBIT
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- -19.50%
- YTD
- -26.82%
- 6M
- -28.95%
- 1Y
- -36.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.56%
- 1M
- 60.49%
- YTD
- 39.90%
- 6M
- 53.41%
- 1Y
- 60.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBIT vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | -26.82% | -2.49% | 14.21% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 39.90% | -29.11% | -76.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBIT and BTCZ is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | -0.94 |
The correlation between YBIT and BTCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBIT vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
YBIT
BTCZ
YBIT vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YBIT | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.17 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 1.24 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 2.36 | -3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBIT | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | 0.69 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | -0.55 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
YBIT vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBIT | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.54% | -91.06% | +45.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.54% | -49.02% | +3.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.78% | -77.44% | +32.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -73.73% | +58.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.85% | 25.76% | -0.91% |
Volatility
YBIT vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) is 7.61%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 17.24%. This indicates that YBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBIT | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 17.24% | -9.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.76% | 67.20% | -38.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.16% | 87.54% | -51.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.65% | 97.10% | -58.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.65% | 97.10% | -58.45% |
YBIT vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBIT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBIT vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.79%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | 105.79% | 88.33% | 60.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBIT and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCZ has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to YBIT (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBIT dropped -45.54% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.
On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 60.52% vs -36.59% for YBIT. On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YBIT has been the lower-risk option at 7.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 60.52% return vs -36.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YBIT.
YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 105.79%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YBIT and 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YBIT and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer