YAVG.NEO vs. YTSL.NEO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

YAVG.NEO (Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and YTSL.NEO (Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YAVG.NEO returned 105.48% vs 49.81% for YTSL.NEO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

YAVG.NEO vs. YTSL.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO) and Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YAVG.NEO achieves a 42.78% return, which is significantly higher than YTSL.NEO's -7.41% return.

YAVG.NEO

• 1D: -10.74%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 42.78%
• 6M: 30.18%
• 1Y: 105.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YTSL.NEO

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 7.81%
• YTD: -7.41%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 49.81%
• 3Y*: 28.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YAVG.NEO vs. YTSL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YAVG.NEO Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	42.78%	57.91%
YTSL.NEO Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	-7.41%	43.43%

Correlation

The correlation between YAVG.NEO and YTSL.NEO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

YAVG.NEO vs. YTSL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YAVG.NEO

YAVG.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 70
YAVG.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
YAVG.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
YAVG.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
YAVG.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
YAVG.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

YTSL.NEO

YTSL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 33
YTSL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
YTSL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
YTSL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 32
YTSL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
YTSL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YAVG.NEO vs. YTSL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO) and Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YAVG.NEO	YTSL.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.04	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	1.55	+1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.21	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	2.02	+2.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.10	5.28	+6.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YAVG.NEO vs. YTSL.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YAVG.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the YTSL.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YAVG.NEO and YTSL.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YAVG.NEO	YTSL.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.04	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.67	0.57	+1.09

Drawdowns

YAVG.NEO vs. YTSL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YAVG.NEO drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum YTSL.NEO drawdown of -58.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YAVG.NEO and YTSL.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	YAVG.NEO	YTSL.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.57%	-58.40%	+18.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.90%	-24.81%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-58.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.18%	-8.46%	-2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-20.46%	+12.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.75%	9.59%	-0.84%

Volatility

YAVG.NEO vs. YTSL.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO) has a higher volatility of 16.20% compared to Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO) at 12.78%. This indicates that YAVG.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YTSL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YAVG.NEO	YTSL.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.20%	12.78%	+3.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.35%	29.36%	+9.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.06%	48.20%	+0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.26%	61.82%	-8.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.26%	61.82%	-8.56%

Dividends

YAVG.NEO vs. YTSL.NEO - Dividend Comparison

YAVG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.38%, less than YTSL.NEO's 46.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
YAVG.NEO Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	24.38%	8.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YTSL.NEO Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	46.17%	36.11%	12.80%	24.07%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YAVG.NEO and YTSL.NEO in my portfolio?

YAVG.NEO and YTSL.NEO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.