YAVG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO
YAVG.NEO (Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YAVG.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose, while QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YAVG.NEO returned 80.53% vs 29.39% for QQCI.TO. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. YAVG.NEO charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for QQCI.TO.
Performance
YAVG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YAVG.NEO achieves a 44.89% return, which is significantly higher than QQCI.TO's 16.78% return.
YAVG.NEO
- 1D
- 13.56%
- 1M
- 19.71%
- 6M
- 56.88%
- YTD
- 44.89%
- 1Y
- 80.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 75.79%
QQCI.TO
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 16.86%
- YTD
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 29.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$127.06K | CA$114.04K | CA$155.19K | |
| CA$129.79K | CA$111.65K | CA$131.34K |
YAVG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YAVG.NEO Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 44.89% | 56.73% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 16.78% | 8.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between YAVG.NEO and QQCI.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YAVG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
YAVG.NEO
QQCI.TO
YAVG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YAVG.NEO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 3.48 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | 11.50 | -4.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YAVG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YAVG.NEO drawdown since its inception was -40.03%, which is greater than QQCI.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YAVG.NEO and QQCI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YAVG.NEO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.03% | -18.95% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.90% | -8.48% | -17.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -1.82% | -8.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -3.07% | -6.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.48% | 2.56% | +8.92% |
Volatility
YAVG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) at 6.46%. This indicates that YAVG.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YAVG.NEO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.60% | 6.46% | +10.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.34% | 12.18% | +33.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.11% | 15.41% | +41.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.12% | 16.18% | +39.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.12% | 16.18% | +39.94% |
YAVG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
YAVG.NEO has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than QQCI.TO's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
YAVG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison
YAVG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.31%, more than QQCI.TO's 8.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 8.94% | 9.34% | 3.17% |
YAVG.NEO Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 27.31% | 8.90% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YAVG.NEO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQCI.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for YAVG.NEO.
YAVG.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQCI.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Purpose and CI. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for YAVG.NEO and 0.21% for QQCI.TO.
Find the right allocation for YAVG.NEO and QQCI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer