YANG vs. TSDD
YANG (Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YANG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%), while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. YANG is passively managed, while TSDD is actively managed. Over the past year, YANG returned -12.94% vs -62.89% for TSDD. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YANG charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
YANG vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YANG achieves a 18.42% return, which is significantly higher than TSDD's -4.27% return.
YANG
- 1D
- 6.57%
- 1M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 18.42%
- 6M
- 23.43%
- 1Y
- -12.94%
- 3Y*
- -47.01%
- 5Y*
- -33.76%
- 10Y*
- -38.75%
TSDD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -7.92%
- 1Y
- -62.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YANG vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 18.42% | -62.77% | -71.41% | 12.06% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -4.27% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between YANG and TSDD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YANG vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
YANG
TSDD
YANG vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YANG | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | -0.68 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.08 | -0.87 | +0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.90 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | -0.83 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | -1.05 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YANG | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | -0.68 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -0.66 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
YANG vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YANG drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YANG and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YANG | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -99.03% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.85% | -76.12% | +37.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.97% | -98.90% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.52% | -71.21% | -19.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.12% | 59.88% | -33.76% |
Volatility
YANG vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) is 21.22%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 24.19%. This indicates that YANG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YANG | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.22% | 24.19% | -2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.63% | 54.90% | -12.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.83% | 92.57% | -33.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.44% | 114.46% | -20.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.12% | 114.46% | -32.34% |
YANG vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
YANG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
YANG vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than TSDD's 8.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.80% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 3.45% | 4.03% | 9.42% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YANG and TSDD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to YANG (21.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YANG dropped -99.98% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, YANG leads with -12.94% vs -62.89% for TSDD. On fees, YANG is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, YANG has been the lower-risk option at 21.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YANG has performed better with a -12.94% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YANG is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 3.45% for YANG.
YANG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for YANG and 1.50% for TSDD.
YANG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YANG and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer