PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO).

YAMZ.NEO and BTCC-U.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. YAMZ.NEO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Dec 19, 2022. BTCC-U.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Nov 9, 2021.

Performance

YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF		-10.15%9.09%48.13%96.20%-1.05%
BTCC-U.TO
Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units		-21.00%-11.70%137.29%147.56%-2.10%
Different Trading Currencies

YAMZ.NEO is traded in CAD, while BTCC-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTCC-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YAMZ.NEO achieves a -10.15% return, which is significantly higher than BTCC-U.TO's -21.00% return.

YAMZ.NEO

1D
5.33%
1M
1.54%
YTD
-10.15%
6M
-2.65%
1Y
13.81%
3Y*
31.51%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

BTCC-U.TO

1D
0.95%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-21.00%
6M
-42.21%
1Y
-22.81%
3Y*
33.23%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF

Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units

Often compared with YAMZ.NEO:
YAMZ.NEO vs. SBT.TOYAMZ.NEO vs. BTCY.TOYAMZ.NEO vs. PSA.TOYAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TOYAMZ.NEO vs. BRKY.NEOYAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC.TOYAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-B.TO
Often compared with BTCC-U.TO:
BTCC-U.TO vs. ETC.TOBTCC-U.TO vs. BTCC-B.TOBTCC-U.TO vs. EBIT.TOBTCC-U.TO vs. CCCX-B.TOBTCC-U.TO vs. CCCX.TOBTCC-U.TO vs. ETHX.TOBTCC-U.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO

YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF

Return for Risk

YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
YAMZ.NEO
YAMZ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
BTCC-U.TO
BTCC-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BTCC-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

YAMZ.NEOBTCC-U.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

-0.52

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.77

-0.50

+1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.94

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

-0.42

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.69

-0.89

+2.57

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the BTCC-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YAMZ.NEO and BTCC-U.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

YAMZ.NEOBTCC-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

-0.52

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.07

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.10

+0.98

Correlation

The correlation between YAMZ.NEO and BTCC-U.TO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

YAMZ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.63%, while BTCC-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM2025202420232022
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF		16.63%14.12%8.07%7.89%1.02%
BTCC-U.TO
Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YAMZ.NEO drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum BTCC-U.TO drawdown of -75.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YAMZ.NEO and BTCC-U.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

YAMZ.NEOBTCC-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-76.91%

+42.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.79%

-49.37%

+27.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-76.91%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.05%

-45.84%

+29.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-33.75%

+26.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.92%

23.35%

-14.43%

Volatility

YAMZ.NEO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) is 11.57%, while Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that YAMZ.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCC-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

YAMZ.NEOBTCC-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.57%

12.99%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.93%

36.45%

-11.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.22%

44.46%

-7.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.46%

55.06%

-20.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.46%

55.23%

-20.77%