YAFFX vs. HLMIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

YAFFX (AMG Yacktman Focused Fund) and HLMIX (Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - YAFFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG, while HLMIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Harding Loevner. Over the past 10 years, YAFFX returned 12.45%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for HLMIX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YAFFX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for HLMIX.

Performance

YAFFX vs. HLMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) and Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YAFFX achieves a 23.48% return, which is significantly higher than HLMIX's 15.13% return. Over the past 10 years, YAFFX has outperformed HLMIX with an annualized return of 12.45%, while HLMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.23% annualized return.

YAFFX

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 23.48%
• 6M: 26.10%
• 1Y: 19.98%
• 3Y*: 16.02%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: 12.45%

HLMIX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 15.13%
• 6M: 15.09%
• 1Y: 31.16%
• 3Y*: 16.19%
• 5Y*: 6.98%
• 10Y*: 10.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YAFFX vs. HLMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund	23.48%	3.89%	9.30%	16.53%	-8.20%	16.48%	17.22%	19.21%	2.99%	20.07%
HLMIX Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio	15.13%	27.63%	1.18%	15.10%	-20.21%	8.49%	20.33%	25.22%	-13.96%	29.91%

Correlation

The correlation between YAFFX and HLMIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1997	0.63

The correlation between YAFFX and HLMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

YAFFX vs. HLMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YAFFX

YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 14
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

HLMIX

HLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 62
HLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
HLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
HLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
HLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YAFFX vs. HLMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) and Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YAFFX	HLMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	2.12	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	2.90	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.38	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	3.08	-1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	11.69	-7.66

YAFFX vs. HLMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YAFFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the HLMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YAFFX and HLMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YAFFX vs. HLMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YAFFX drawdown since its inception was -43.80%, smaller than the maximum HLMIX drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YAFFX and HLMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	YAFFX	HLMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.80%	-58.03%	+14.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.08%	-10.44%	-6.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.88%	-13.98%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.31%	-32.76%	+11.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.62%	-32.76%	+2.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.02%	-0.48%	-5.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-12.68%	+6.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	2.74%	+2.08%

Volatility

YAFFX vs. HLMIX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a higher volatility of 7.15% compared to Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) at 5.62%. This indicates that YAFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YAFFX	HLMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.15%	5.62%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.88%	12.97%	+9.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.86%	15.16%	+7.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.24%	16.07%	+2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.61%	16.50%	+0.11%

YAFFX vs. HLMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YAFFX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HLMIX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

YAFFX vs. HLMIX - Dividend Comparison

YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HLMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLMIX Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio	12.98%	14.94%	7.14%	3.79%	2.51%	2.48%	0.75%	1.59%	1.50%	1.64%	0.98%	1.02%
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund	0.00%	0.00%	18.44%	4.42%	7.60%	4.70%	11.87%	15.84%	22.15%	11.82%	11.81%	24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YAFFX and HLMIX in my portfolio?

YAFFX and HLMIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YAFFX or HLMIX?

YAFFX has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to HLMIX (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YAFFX dropped -43.80% vs HLMIX's -58.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.