PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YAFFX vs. ARSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YAFFX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YAFFX achieves a 30.77% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, YAFFX has outperformed ARSMX with an annualized return of 12.89%, while ARSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.26% annualized return.


YAFFX

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.70%
YTD
30.77%
6M
14.70%
1Y
28.89%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
12.89%

ARSMX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
-5.58%
1Y
0.32%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YAFFX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
30.77%3.89%9.30%16.53%-8.20%16.48%17.22%19.21%2.99%20.07%
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
-0.63%-0.83%12.42%14.48%-8.62%23.41%1.71%34.82%-6.44%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between YAFFX and ARSMX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between YAFFX and ARSMX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YAFFX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YAFFX
YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSMX
ARSMX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ARSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YAFFX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YAFFXARSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.03

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

0.15

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

0.35

+5.83

YAFFX vs. ARSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YAFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the ARSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YAFFX and ARSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YAFFXARSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.11

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.20

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.48

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.35

+0.27

Drawdowns

YAFFX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YAFFX drawdown since its inception was -43.80%, smaller than the maximum ARSMX drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YAFFX and ARSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YAFFXARSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.80%

-51.75%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.08%

-10.37%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-19.34%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-19.34%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.62%

-42.96%

+12.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-8.08%

+7.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-8.11%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

4.34%

+0.36%

Volatility

YAFFX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 2.96%. This indicates that YAFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YAFFXARSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

2.96%

+3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.29%

10.18%

+12.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.19%

14.38%

+7.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

17.78%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

19.58%

-3.05%

YAFFX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YAFFX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

YAFFX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison

Neither YAFFX nor ARSMX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%9.27%3.89%4.85%5.86%0.00%3.60%8.60%15.66%8.03%17.82%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
0.00%0.00%18.44%4.42%7.60%4.70%11.87%15.84%22.15%11.82%11.81%24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


YAFFX and ARSMX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YAFFX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to ARSMX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YAFFX dropped -43.80% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.

YAFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YAFFX and ARSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer