YACKX vs. TILVX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX).
YACKX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jul 6, 1992. TILVX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
YACKX vs. TILVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YACKX vs. TILVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 5.65% | 1.34% | 13.15% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 27.49% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
TILVX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund | 2.07% | 15.81% | 14.26% | 11.49% | -7.57% | 25.05% | 2.90% | 26.48% | -8.38% | 10.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YACKX achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than TILVX's 2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, YACKX has outperformed TILVX with an annualized return of 11.36%, while TILVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.
YACKX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- -5.11%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
TILVX
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 15.81%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YACKX vs. TILVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
YACKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than TILVX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
YACKX vs. TILVX — Risk / Return Rank
YACKX
TILVX
YACKX vs. TILVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YACKX | TILVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.01 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 1.46 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.22 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 1.30 | -1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 6.11 | -5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YACKX | TILVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.01 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.62 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.58 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.45 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between YACKX and TILVX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
YACKX vs. TILVX - Dividend Comparison
YACKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TILVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.32% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 16.84% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
TILVX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund | 5.84% | 5.96% | 3.04% | 4.90% | 4.57% | 3.77% | 2.26% | 7.05% | 4.68% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 4.24% |
Drawdowns
YACKX vs. TILVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YACKX drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum TILVX drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YACKX and TILVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YACKX | TILVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -60.05% | +13.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.30% | -11.79% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.86% | -19.00% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.93% | -40.15% | +9.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.42% | -4.83% | -4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -8.32% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 2.51% | +2.99% |
Volatility
YACKX vs. TILVX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) at 4.38%. This indicates that YACKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YACKX | TILVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 4.38% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.29% | 8.32% | +10.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 15.76% | +5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 14.82% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 17.65% | -1.55% |