YACKX vs. GWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund (GWMIX).
YACKX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jul 6, 1992. GWMIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jun 29, 2009.
Performance
YACKX vs. GWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YACKX vs. GWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 5.65% | 1.34% | 13.15% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 27.49% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
GWMIX AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund | -0.90% | 5.52% | 0.04% | 6.04% | -7.45% | 4.19% | 4.70% | 7.91% | 0.87% | 4.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YACKX achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than GWMIX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, YACKX has outperformed GWMIX with an annualized return of 11.36%, while GWMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.23% annualized return.
YACKX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- -5.11%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
GWMIX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 2.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YACKX vs. GWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
YACKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than GWMIX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
YACKX vs. GWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
YACKX
GWMIX
YACKX vs. GWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund (GWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YACKX | GWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.13 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 1.45 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.31 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 1.28 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 4.32 | -3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YACKX | GWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.13 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.37 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.56 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.97 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between YACKX and GWMIX is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
YACKX vs. GWMIX - Dividend Comparison
YACKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.32% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 16.84% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
GWMIX AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund | 2.71% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.11% | 1.89% | 5.75% | 1.82% | 2.19% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 3.38% | 3.01% |
Drawdowns
YACKX vs. GWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YACKX drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than GWMIX's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YACKX and GWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YACKX | GWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -12.27% | -34.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.30% | -4.41% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.86% | -12.27% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.93% | -12.27% | -18.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.42% | -3.46% | -5.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -1.97% | -3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 1.30% | +4.20% |
Volatility
YACKX vs. GWMIX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund (GWMIX) at 1.38%. This indicates that YACKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YACKX | GWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 1.38% | +3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.29% | 1.87% | +17.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 4.45% | +16.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 4.09% | +12.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 3.98% | +12.12% |