XZWG.DE vs. EUNU.DE
XZWG.DE (Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF) and EUNU.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Bonds funds - XZWG.DE tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg EUR while EUNU.DE tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XZWG.DE returned -0.15%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for EUNU.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XZWG.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EUNU.DE.
Performance
XZWG.DE vs. EUNU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XZWG.DE achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly higher than EUNU.DE's -0.39% return.
XZWG.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- -1.04%
- 3Y*
- -0.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNU.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- -0.91%
- 1Y
- -0.79%
- 3Y*
- 1.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
XZWG.DE vs. EUNU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XZWG.DE Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF | 0.27% | -4.17% | 1.51% | 2.50% | -16.73% | -1.34% |
EUNU.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -0.39% | -4.02% | 5.70% | 4.05% | -10.69% | -1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between XZWG.DE and EUNU.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XZWG.DE and EUNU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XZWG.DE vs. EUNU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XZWG.DE
EUNU.DE
XZWG.DE vs. EUNU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZWG.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUNU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XZWG.DE | EUNU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.96 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.30 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | -0.67 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XZWG.DE | EUNU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | -0.29 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.23 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
XZWG.DE vs. EUNU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XZWG.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, which is greater than EUNU.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZWG.DE and EUNU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XZWG.DE | EUNU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.85% | -12.88% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -3.82% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.10% | -8.28% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.96% | -7.39% | -10.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.29% | -4.71% | -10.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | 1.71% | -0.30% |
Volatility
XZWG.DE vs. EUNU.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZWG.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUNU.DE) at 0.95%. This indicates that XZWG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XZWG.DE | EUNU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 0.95% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 2.92% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 3.99% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 6.06% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 5.76% | +0.92% |
XZWG.DE vs. EUNU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XZWG.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNU.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XZWG.DE vs. EUNU.DE - Dividend Comparison
XZWG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than EUNU.DE's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNU.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.53% | 3.21% | 4.10% | 4.25% | 1.55% | 2.78% | 2.49% | 2.47% | 2.10% |
XZWG.DE Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF | 2.58% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 1.74% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XZWG.DE and EUNU.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNU.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNU.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XZWG.DE.
XZWG.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg EUR, while EUNU.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XZWG.DE and 0.10% for EUNU.DE.
Find the right allocation for XZWG.DE and EUNU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer