PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZWG.DE vs. AHYB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZWG.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZWG.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XZWG.DE is traded in EUR, while AHYB.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AHYB.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZWG.DE achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than AHYB.DE's 1.44% return.


XZWG.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.27%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
-1.04%
3Y*
-0.15%
5Y*
10Y*

AHYB.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
1.27%
YTD
1.44%
6M
0.61%
1Y
0.85%
3Y*
0.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZWG.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XZWG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.27%-4.17%1.51%2.50%-5.17%
AHYB.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD
1.45%-7.58%8.10%3.80%-3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XZWG.DE and AHYB.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022

0.61

The correlation between XZWG.DE and AHYB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZWG.DE vs. AHYB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZWG.DE
XZWG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XZWG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZWG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZWG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XZWG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZWG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

AHYB.DE
AHYB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AHYB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZWG.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZWG.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZWG.DEAHYB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.03

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

0.18

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

0.47

-1.44

XZWG.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZWG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the AHYB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZWG.DE and AHYB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZWG.DEAHYB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

0.14

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.64

0.06

-0.70

Drawdowns

XZWG.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZWG.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, which is greater than AHYB.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZWG.DE and AHYB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZWG.DEAHYB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-12.85%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-4.60%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.10%

-11.29%

+4.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.96%

-7.94%

-10.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.29%

-7.10%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

1.80%

-0.39%

Volatility

XZWG.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZWG.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE) at 1.34%. This indicates that XZWG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHYB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZWG.DEAHYB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.34%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

4.35%

-1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

5.90%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.68%

7.95%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.68%

7.95%

-1.27%

XZWG.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZWG.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AHYB.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZWG.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Dividend Comparison

XZWG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while AHYB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AHYB.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XZWG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF
2.58%2.53%2.56%1.74%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZWG.DE and AHYB.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AHYB.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AHYB.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XZWG.DE.

XZWG.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg EUR, while AHYB.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI Sector Neutral (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XZWG.DE and 0.16% for AHYB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZWG.DE and AHYB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer