PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZW0.DE vs. AMEC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZW0.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZW0.DE) and Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZW0.DE achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than AMEC.DE's 30.58% return.


XZW0.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
3.19%
YTD
7.60%
6M
8.16%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*

AMEC.DE

1D
-1.34%
1M
10.00%
YTD
30.58%
6M
28.27%
1Y
45.51%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZW0.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XZW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C
7.60%6.65%27.16%22.75%-16.66%37.46%5.71%4.09%
AMEC.DE
Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF
30.58%9.65%16.27%1.43%-18.74%9.30%9.10%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XZW0.DE and AMEC.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.78

The correlation between XZW0.DE and AMEC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZW0.DE vs. AMEC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZW0.DE
XZW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XZW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XZW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEC.DE
AMEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZW0.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZW0.DE) and Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZW0.DEAMEC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

5.09

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

16.11

-8.84

XZW0.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZW0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the AMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZW0.DE and AMEC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZW0.DEAMEC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.65

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.38

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.44

+0.36

Drawdowns

XZW0.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, smaller than the maximum AMEC.DE drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZW0.DE and AMEC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZW0.DEAMEC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.22%

-35.49%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-9.02%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

-24.98%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.36%

-27.33%

+4.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-1.34%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-11.50%

+6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.86%

-0.10%

Volatility

XZW0.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZW0.DE) is 3.11%, while Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that XZW0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZW0.DEAMEC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

6.73%

-3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

13.09%

-4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

17.36%

-5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

17.51%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

19.22%

-2.84%

XZW0.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZW0.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEC.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XZW0.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZW0.DE nor AMEC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XZW0.DE and AMEC.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZW0.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZW0.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AMEC.DE.

XZW0.DE tracks MSCI World Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while AMEC.DE tracks Solactive Smart City. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XZW0.DE and 0.35% for AMEC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZW0.DE and AMEC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer