PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZMU.DE vs. VUAA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZMU.DE vs. VUAA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF (VUAA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZMU.DE achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than VUAA.DE's 11.41% return.


XZMU.DE

1D
0.69%
1M
3.83%
YTD
8.21%
6M
8.42%
1Y
23.33%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
14.63%
10Y*

VUAA.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
5.23%
YTD
11.41%
6M
11.44%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZMU.DE vs. VUAA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XZMU.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C
8.21%5.12%32.57%26.56%-17.86%45.90%3.11%
VUAA.DE
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF
11.41%4.68%32.33%22.52%-14.29%40.76%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XZMU.DE and VUAA.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2020

0.97

The correlation between XZMU.DE and VUAA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZMU.DE vs. VUAA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZMU.DE
XZMU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XZMU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZMU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZMU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XZMU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZMU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAA.DE
VUAA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VUAA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZMU.DE vs. VUAA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF (VUAA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZMU.DEVUAA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.41

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.56

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

12.74

-5.12

XZMU.DE vs. VUAA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZMU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the VUAA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZMU.DE and VUAA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZMU.DEVUAA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.20

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.97

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.81

+0.12

Drawdowns

XZMU.DE vs. VUAA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZMU.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, roughly equal to the maximum VUAA.DE drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZMU.DE and VUAA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZMU.DEVUAA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-33.67%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-7.16%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-23.33%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.76%

-23.33%

-1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.45%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-5.07%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.01%

+1.06%

Volatility

XZMU.DE vs. VUAA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF (VUAA.DE) at 2.65%. This indicates that XZMU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZMU.DEVUAA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.65%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

7.61%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

11.58%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

15.12%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

17.59%

+0.30%

XZMU.DE vs. VUAA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZMU.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZMU.DE vs. VUAA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZMU.DE nor VUAA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XZMU.DE and VUAA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VUAA.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XZMU.DE.

XZMU.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VUAA.DE is S&P 500. XZMU.DE tracks MSCI USA Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while VUAA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XZMU.DE and 0.07% for VUAA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZMU.DE and VUAA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer