PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZMU.DE vs. IBCY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZMU.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBCY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XZMU.DE

1D
0.69%
1M
5.33%
YTD
8.21%
6M
9.17%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
14.63%
10Y*

IBCY.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
13.35%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZMU.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XZMU.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C
8.21%5.12%32.57%26.56%-17.86%45.90%9.13%36.81%-5.06%
IBCY.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF
0.00%6.35%29.21%13.73%-11.70%36.60%0.17%28.63%-6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XZMU.DE and IBCY.DE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2018

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between XZMU.DE and IBCY.DE has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZMU.DE vs. IBCY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZMU.DE
XZMU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XZMU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZMU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZMU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XZMU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZMU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCY.DE
IBCY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IBCY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZMU.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBCY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZMU.DEIBCY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.56

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

4.08

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

19.99

-12.36

XZMU.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZMU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the IBCY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZMU.DE and IBCY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZMU.DEIBCY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.70

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.69

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.63

+0.31

Drawdowns

XZMU.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZMU.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, roughly equal to the maximum IBCY.DE drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZMU.DE and IBCY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZMU.DEIBCY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-35.54%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-3.26%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-22.91%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.76%

-22.91%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-4.95%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

0.67%

+2.40%

Volatility

XZMU.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBCY.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that XZMU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZMU.DEIBCY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

0.00%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

0.00%

+8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

7.99%

+4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

14.77%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

16.12%

+1.77%

XZMU.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZMU.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCY.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XZMU.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZMU.DE nor IBCY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XZMU.DE and IBCY.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZMU.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZMU.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBCY.DE.

XZMU.DE tracks MSCI USA Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while IBCY.DE tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multiple-Factor. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XZMU.DE and 0.35% for IBCY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZMU.DE and IBCY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer