PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZMD.DE vs. SGAS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZMD.DE vs. SGAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZMD.DE achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than SGAS.DE's 11.26% return.


XZMD.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
5.36%
YTD
8.27%
6M
9.20%
1Y
23.50%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
10Y*

SGAS.DE

1D
-0.42%
1M
4.83%
YTD
11.26%
6M
10.63%
1Y
26.08%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
15.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZMD.DE vs. SGAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XZMD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D
8.27%5.05%32.63%26.55%-9.55%
SGAS.DE
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.26%5.13%33.97%26.37%-9.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XZMD.DE and SGAS.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.97

The correlation between XZMD.DE and SGAS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZMD.DE vs. SGAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZMD.DE
XZMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XZMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XZMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SGAS.DE
SGAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SGAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SGAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZMD.DE vs. SGAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZMD.DESGAS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.08

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

10.78

-3.07

XZMD.DE vs. SGAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZMD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SGAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZMD.DE and SGAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZMD.DESGAS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.11

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.92

-0.05

Drawdowns

XZMD.DE vs. SGAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, smaller than the maximum SGAS.DE drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZMD.DE and SGAS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZMD.DESGAS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.74%

-33.55%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-8.51%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.74%

-24.66%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.42%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-4.83%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.44%

+0.60%

Volatility

XZMD.DE vs. SGAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGAS.DE) have volatilities of 3.09% and 3.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZMD.DESGAS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

3.03%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

8.33%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

12.53%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

16.02%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

17.61%

-1.58%

XZMD.DE vs. SGAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZMD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SGAS.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZMD.DE vs. SGAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

XZMD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while SGAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SGAS.DE
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XZMD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D
0.68%0.81%0.91%0.97%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XZMD.DE and SGAS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SGAS.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XZMD.DE.

XZMD.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while SGAS.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Screened. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XZMD.DE and 0.07% for SGAS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZMD.DE and SGAS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer