XZMD.DE vs. D6RQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XZMD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D) and D6RQ.DE (Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XZMD.DE tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while D6RQ.DE tracks the MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XZMD.DE returned 18.73%/yr vs 23.10%/yr for D6RQ.DE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XZMD.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for D6RQ.DE.

Performance

XZMD.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZMD.DE achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than D6RQ.DE's 14.41% return.

XZMD.DE

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 5.36%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 23.50%
• 3Y*: 18.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

D6RQ.DE

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 8.70%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 6M: 14.10%
• 1Y: 33.24%
• 3Y*: 23.10%
• 5Y*: 17.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZMD.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XZMD.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D	8.27%	5.05%	32.63%	26.55%	-9.55%
D6RQ.DE Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF	14.41%	4.36%	42.08%	34.15%	-13.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XZMD.DE and D6RQ.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022	0.95

The correlation between XZMD.DE and D6RQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XZMD.DE vs. D6RQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZMD.DE

XZMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 51
XZMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
XZMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
XZMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XZMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
XZMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

D6RQ.DE

D6RQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
D6RQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
D6RQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
D6RQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
D6RQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZMD.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XZMD.DE	D6RQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.23	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.97	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.39	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	2.69	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.70	7.85	-0.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XZMD.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZMD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZMD.DE and D6RQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XZMD.DE	D6RQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	2.23	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	1.09	-0.21

Drawdowns

XZMD.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, smaller than the maximum D6RQ.DE drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZMD.DE and D6RQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XZMD.DE	D6RQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.74%	-27.29%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.73%	-12.28%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.74%	-27.29%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.84%	+0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.23%	-5.82%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	4.22%	-1.18%

Volatility

XZMD.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE) is 3.09%, while Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that XZMD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than D6RQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XZMD.DE	D6RQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	4.06%	-0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	10.35%	-1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.69%	14.84%	-2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.03%	17.79%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	17.56%	-1.53%

XZMD.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZMD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than D6RQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XZMD.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

XZMD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than D6RQ.DE's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
D6RQ.DE Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF	0.37%	0.53%	0.39%	0.60%	0.80%	0.46%	0.25%
XZMD.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D	0.68%	0.81%	0.91%	0.97%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XZMD.DE and D6RQ.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, XZMD.DE and D6RQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XZMD.DE or D6RQ.DE?

On fees, XZMD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XZMD.DE or D6RQ.DE?

XZMD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.

What is the main difference between XZMD.DE and D6RQ.DE?

XZMD.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while D6RQ.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Deka. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XZMD.DE and 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.