PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZEW.DE vs. WELE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZEW.DE vs. WELE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEW.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WELE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZEW.DE achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than WELE.DE's 8.45% return.


XZEW.DE

1D
0.38%
1M
4.75%
YTD
10.78%
6M
11.99%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
12.65%
5Y*
10Y*

WELE.DE

1D
0.41%
1M
4.81%
YTD
8.45%
6M
9.89%
1Y
18.08%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZEW.DE vs. WELE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XZEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C
10.78%1.09%18.02%10.63%-3.60%
WELE.DE
Amundi S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF Acc
8.45%0.70%16.40%10.64%-3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XZEW.DE and WELE.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022

0.98

The correlation between XZEW.DE and WELE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZEW.DE vs. WELE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZEW.DE
XZEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XZEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

WELE.DE
WELE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WELE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
WELE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZEW.DE vs. WELE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEW.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WELE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZEW.DEWELE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

2.87

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

9.27

+3.48

XZEW.DE vs. WELE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZEW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the WELE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZEW.DE and WELE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZEW.DEWELE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.59

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.74

0.00

Drawdowns

XZEW.DE vs. WELE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, roughly equal to the maximum WELE.DE drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZEW.DE and WELE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZEW.DEWELE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.98%

-23.73%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-6.28%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.98%

-23.73%

-0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-5.63%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.95%

-0.25%

Volatility

XZEW.DE vs. WELE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEW.DE) is 2.12%, while Amundi S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WELE.DE) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that XZEW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WELE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZEW.DEWELE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

2.24%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

7.47%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

11.35%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

14.41%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.97%

14.41%

-0.44%

XZEW.DE vs. WELE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZEW.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than WELE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZEW.DE vs. WELE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZEW.DE nor WELE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, XZEW.DE and WELE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XZEW.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELE.DE.

XZEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG, while WELE.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for XZEW.DE and 0.18% for WELE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZEW.DE and WELE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer