PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEU.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZEU.L achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.41% return.


XZEU.L

1D
0.91%
1M
5.23%
YTD
5.27%
6M
6.95%
1Y
8.86%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*

LDEG.L

1D
0.89%
1M
1.38%
YTD
10.41%
6M
13.94%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XZEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG UCITS ETF 1C
5.27%12.69%6.78%14.21%-7.80%9.08%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.41%44.92%8.83%14.32%3.42%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XZEU.L and LDEG.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.68

The correlation between XZEU.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.81 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XZEU.L
LDEG.L

Financial Services

25.0%
41.5%

Industrials

20.4%
15.8%

Technology

17.1%
2.0%

Healthcare

14.1%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
3.1%

Basic Materials

5.3%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
3.3%

Communication Services

4.6%
5.2%

Utilities

1.5%
8.2%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Energy

-

7.7%

Financial Services

XZEU.L
25.0%
LDEG.L
41.5%

Industrials

XZEU.L
20.4%
LDEG.L
15.8%

Technology

XZEU.L
17.1%
LDEG.L
2.0%

Healthcare

XZEU.L
14.1%
LDEG.L
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

XZEU.L
5.5%
LDEG.L
3.1%

Basic Materials

XZEU.L
5.3%
LDEG.L
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XZEU.L
5.2%
LDEG.L
3.3%

Communication Services

XZEU.L
4.6%
LDEG.L
5.2%

Utilities

XZEU.L
1.5%
LDEG.L
8.2%

Real Estate

XZEU.L
1.3%
LDEG.L

-

Energy

XZEU.L

-

LDEG.L
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZEU.L
XZEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XZEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEU.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZEU.LLDEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.48

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

3.78

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

13.82

-11.20

XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZEU.L and LDEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZEU.LLDEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.63

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.24

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.24

-0.71

Drawdowns

XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZEU.L drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZEU.L and LDEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZEU.LLDEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-15.97%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-8.04%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-12.05%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-15.97%

-3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.33%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-2.95%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.20%

+1.17%

Volatility

XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEU.L) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that XZEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZEU.LLDEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.57%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

9.21%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

11.55%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

15.99%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

16.01%

-0.50%

XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZEU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZEU.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison

XZEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.13%3.43%4.21%4.11%3.70%3.11%
XZEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZEU.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZEU.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZEU.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.

XZEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XZEU.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZEU.L and LDEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer