XZEM.DE vs. AXQE.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XZEM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and AXQE.DE (AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XZEM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Low Carbon SRI Leaders while AXQE.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XZEM.DE returned 27.23% vs 68.61% for AXQE.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XZEM.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for AXQE.DE.

Performance

XZEM.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEM.DE) and AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZEM.DE achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than AXQE.DE's 37.94% return.

XZEM.DE

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 11.70%
• 6M: 11.70%
• 1Y: 27.23%
• 3Y*: 14.21%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: —

AXQE.DE

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 6.45%
• YTD: 37.94%
• 6M: 42.42%
• 1Y: 68.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZEM.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XZEM.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C	11.70%	9.27%
AXQE.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating	37.94%	28.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XZEM.DE and AXQE.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.73

The correlation between XZEM.DE and AXQE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XZEM.DE vs. AXQE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZEM.DE

XZEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 48
XZEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
XZEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
XZEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 45
XZEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
XZEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 50

AXQE.DE

AXQE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
AXQE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AXQE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
AXQE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AXQE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
AXQE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZEM.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEM.DE) and AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XZEM.DE	AXQE.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.10	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.85	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.51	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	3.48	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.36	14.04	-5.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XZEM.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the AXQE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZEM.DE and AXQE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XZEM.DE	AXQE.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	2.10	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	1.81	-1.53

Drawdowns

XZEM.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, which is greater than AXQE.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZEM.DE and AXQE.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XZEM.DE	AXQE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.16%	-19.63%	-17.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.55%	-19.63%	+9.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.21%	-2.54%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.68%	-2.70%	-13.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	4.87%	-1.62%

Volatility

XZEM.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEM.DE) is 5.92%, while AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that XZEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXQE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XZEM.DE	AXQE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	9.35%	-3.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.59%	30.41%	-16.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	32.57%	-15.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.53%	30.53%	-12.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.72%	30.53%	-9.81%

XZEM.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AXQE.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XZEM.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZEM.DE nor AXQE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XZEM.DE and AXQE.DE in my portfolio?

XZEM.DE and AXQE.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XZEM.DE or AXQE.DE?

On fees, XZEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XZEM.DE or AXQE.DE?

XZEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for AXQE.DE.

What is the main difference between XZEM.DE and AXQE.DE?

XZEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while AXQE.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XZEM.DE and 0.30% for AXQE.DE.