PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZEC.DE vs. LTVL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZEC.DE vs. LTVL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Acc (LTVL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZEC.DE achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly higher than LTVL.DE's -8.21% return.


XZEC.DE

1D
1.36%
1M
3.79%
YTD
3.52%
6M
4.05%
1Y
11.05%
3Y*
2.19%
5Y*
10Y*

LTVL.DE

1D
0.62%
1M
6.75%
YTD
-8.21%
6M
-7.48%
1Y
-5.08%
3Y*
-4.81%
5Y*
-4.06%
10Y*
-0.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZEC.DE vs. LTVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XZEC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF
3.52%1.95%3.52%16.28%-16.49%0.39%
LTVL.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Acc
-8.21%1.60%-4.23%22.42%-13.28%-9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XZEC.DE and LTVL.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021

0.80

The correlation between XZEC.DE and LTVL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZEC.DE vs. LTVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZEC.DE
XZEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XZEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

LTVL.DE
LTVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
LTVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
LTVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZEC.DE vs. LTVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Acc (LTVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZEC.DELTVL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.97

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

-0.27

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.63

-0.66

+3.30

XZEC.DE vs. LTVL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZEC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the LTVL.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZEC.DE and LTVL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZEC.DELTVL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

-0.27

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.07

0.00

Drawdowns

XZEC.DE vs. LTVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZEC.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.22%, smaller than the maximum LTVL.DE drawdown of -65.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZEC.DE and LTVL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZEC.DELTVL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.22%

-65.37%

+35.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-18.90%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.79%

-28.32%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-23.30%

+18.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-20.35%

+10.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

7.63%

-3.44%

Volatility

XZEC.DE vs. LTVL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE) is 4.04%, while Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Acc (LTVL.DE) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that XZEC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZEC.DELTVL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

5.11%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

14.86%

-3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

18.56%

-3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.02%

23.03%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.02%

24.44%

-4.42%

XZEC.DE vs. LTVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZEC.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than LTVL.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XZEC.DE vs. LTVL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZEC.DE nor LTVL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XZEC.DE and LTVL.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZEC.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZEC.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LTVL.DE.

XZEC.DE tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened 20-35 Select, while LTVL.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Travel & Leisure. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for XZEC.DE and 0.30% for LTVL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZEC.DE and LTVL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer