XZEB.DE vs. CB3G.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XZEB.DE (Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF) and CB3G.DE (Amundi Euro Government tilted Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc) are both European Government Bonds funds - XZEB.DE tracks the FTSE ESG Select EMU Government Bond while CB3G.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Treasury Green Bond Tilted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XZEB.DE returned 1.37%/yr vs 2.19%/yr for CB3G.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XZEB.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for CB3G.DE.

Performance

XZEB.DE vs. CB3G.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE) and Amundi Euro Government tilted Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (CB3G.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZEB.DE achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly higher than CB3G.DE's 0.09% return.

XZEB.DE

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: 0.18%
• 1Y: -0.32%
• 3Y*: 1.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CB3G.DE

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: 0.01%
• 1Y: 0.04%
• 3Y*: 2.19%
• 5Y*: -2.40%
• 10Y*: -0.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZEB.DE vs. CB3G.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XZEB.DE Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF	0.20%	-0.59%	0.01%	5.77%	-7.62%
CB3G.DE Amundi Euro Government tilted Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc	0.09%	0.32%	1.42%	6.80%	-7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XZEB.DE and CB3G.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2022	0.97

The correlation between XZEB.DE and CB3G.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XZEB.DE vs. CB3G.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZEB.DE

XZEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7
XZEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XZEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
XZEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6
XZEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XZEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

CB3G.DE

CB3G.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8
CB3G.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CB3G.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CB3G.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CB3G.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
CB3G.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZEB.DE vs. CB3G.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE) and Amundi Euro Government tilted Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (CB3G.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XZEB.DE	CB3G.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	-0.06	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.21	-0.05	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.99	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	-0.08	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.53	-0.19	-0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XZEB.DE vs. CB3G.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the CB3G.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZEB.DE and CB3G.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XZEB.DE	CB3G.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	-0.06	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.35	-0.46

Drawdowns

XZEB.DE vs. CB3G.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.98%, smaller than the maximum CB3G.DE drawdown of -22.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZEB.DE and CB3G.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XZEB.DE	CB3G.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.98%	-22.85%	+8.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-3.40%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.45%	-4.18%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.86%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.28%	-14.83%	+7.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.40%	-8.43%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	1.38%	-0.05%

Volatility

XZEB.DE vs. CB3G.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE) is 1.57%, while Amundi Euro Government tilted Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (CB3G.DE) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that XZEB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CB3G.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XZEB.DE	CB3G.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.57%	1.70%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.45%	3.68%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.14%	4.39%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.32%	6.47%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.32%	5.68%	+0.64%

XZEB.DE vs. CB3G.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZEB.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CB3G.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XZEB.DE vs. CB3G.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZEB.DE nor CB3G.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XZEB.DE and CB3G.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, XZEB.DE and CB3G.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XZEB.DE or CB3G.DE?

On fees, CB3G.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XZEB.DE or CB3G.DE?

CB3G.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XZEB.DE.

What is the main difference between XZEB.DE and CB3G.DE?

XZEB.DE tracks FTSE ESG Select EMU Government Bond, while CB3G.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury Green Bond Tilted. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XZEB.DE and 0.14% for CB3G.DE.