PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYZY vs. EMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XYZY vs. EMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XYZY vs. EMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XYZY
YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF
-11.39%-29.43%39.36%
EMAX.TO
Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
29.64%9.65%-3.03%
Different Trading Currencies

XYZY is traded in USD, while EMAX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the EMAX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZY achieves a -11.39% return, which is significantly lower than EMAX.TO's 29.64% return.


XYZY

1D
3.97%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
-11.39%
6M
-19.31%
1Y
-3.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMAX.TO

1D
-1.88%
1M
8.93%
YTD
29.64%
6M
31.98%
1Y
34.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XYZY vs. EMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYZY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XYZY vs. EMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYZY
XYZY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XYZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XYZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYZY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

EMAX.TO
EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYZY vs. EMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYZYEMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.08

1.33

-1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.19

1.77

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.27

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

1.73

-1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.35

5.68

-6.04

XYZY vs. EMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZY Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZY and EMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYZYEMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

1.33

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.72

-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between XYZY and EMAX.TO is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XYZY vs. EMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

XYZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.04%, more than EMAX.TO's 9.29% yield.


TTM202520242023
XYZY
YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF
109.04%95.35%62.54%9.85%
EMAX.TO
Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
9.29%13.44%12.31%0.00%

Drawdowns

XYZY vs. EMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than EMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZY and EMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XYZYEMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.30%

-27.55%

-24.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.72%

-20.97%

-16.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.36%

-3.30%

-41.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-9.52%

-11.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.80%

8.03%

+7.77%

Volatility

XYZY vs. EMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) has a higher volatility of 11.80% compared to Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) at 5.10%. This indicates that XYZY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XYZYEMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.80%

5.10%

+6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.56%

13.08%

+19.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.37%

26.40%

+18.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.80%

22.56%

+20.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.80%

22.56%

+20.24%