XYLP.L vs. CEGI.L
XYLP.L (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF) and CEGI.L (REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Derivative Income funds. XYLP.L is passively managed, while CEGI.L is actively managed. Over the past year, XYLP.L returned 14.95% vs 30.52% for CEGI.L. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XYLP.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CEGI.L.
Performance
XYLP.L vs. CEGI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XYLP.L is traded in GBP, while CEGI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CEGI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLP.L achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly lower than CEGI.L's 19.20% return.
XYLP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 14.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.25%
CEGI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 30.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| £32.02K | £25.24K | £32.31K | |
| £165.83K | £168.59K | £165.34K |
XYLP.L vs. CEGI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XYLP.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 8.08% | 9.18% |
CEGI.L REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing | 19.20% | 16.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLP.L and CEGI.L is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLP.L vs. CEGI.L — Risk / Return Rank
XYLP.L
CEGI.L
XYLP.L vs. CEGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) and REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XYLP.L | CEGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.16 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 1.10 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.71 | 2.28 | +8.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XYLP.L vs. CEGI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.57%, smaller than the maximum CEGI.L drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLP.L and CEGI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLP.L | CEGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.57% | -27.70% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -27.70% | +23.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -12.34% | +12.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.94% | -9.99% | -2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 13.41% | -12.01% |
Volatility
XYLP.L vs. CEGI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) is 2.34%, while REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that XYLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEGI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLP.L | CEGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 11.81% | -9.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.40% | 25.72% | -19.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.01% | 35.16% | -27.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 34.43% | -17.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 34.43% | -17.39% |
XYLP.L vs. CEGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CEGI.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLP.L vs. CEGI.L - Dividend Comparison
XYLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.31%, less than CEGI.L's 19.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEGI.L REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing | 19.50% | 9.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLP.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 8.31% | 9.01% | 6.22% | 3.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLP.L and CEGI.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XYLP.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XYLP.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CEGI.L.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XYLP.L and 0.65% for CEGI.L.
Find the right allocation for XYLP.L and CEGI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer