XYLP.L vs. BKCC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO).
XYLP.L and BKCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XYLP.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite 15% WHT Index. It was launched on Jul 11, 2023. BKCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on May 16, 2011.
Performance
XYLP.L vs. BKCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XYLP.L vs. BKCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLP.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF | -1.08% | -1.18% | 19.03% | 3.35% |
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF | 1.46% | 24.63% | 9.77% | 5.01% |
Different Trading Currencies
XYLP.L is traded in GBP, while BKCC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BKCC.TO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLP.L achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly lower than BKCC.TO's 1.46% return.
XYLP.L
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 5.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 35.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XYLP.L vs. BKCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BKCC.TO's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XYLP.L vs. BKCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XYLP.L
BKCC.TO
XYLP.L vs. BKCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLP.L | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 2.88 | -2.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | 3.95 | -3.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.56 | -0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 5.24 | -4.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 22.26 | -20.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLP.L | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 2.88 | -2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | -0.00 | +0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLP.L and BKCC.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XYLP.L vs. BKCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
XYLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, less than BKCC.TO's 9.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLP.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 8.04% | 9.01% | 6.22% | 3.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF | 9.64% | 10.43% | 12.30% | 10.93% | 8.23% | 5.52% | 5.92% | 5.44% | 6.24% | 5.76% | 5.79% | 7.35% |
Drawdowns
XYLP.L vs. BKCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, smaller than the maximum BKCC.TO drawdown of -100.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLP.L and BKCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLP.L | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.30% | -100.33% | +81.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -7.71% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -100.00% | +92.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -99.92% | +94.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.85% | +0.95% |
Volatility
XYLP.L vs. BKCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) is 2.97%, while Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that XYLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XYLP.L | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 4.97% | -2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | 8.54% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 12.22% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.60% | 14.95% | -4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.60% | 18.88% | -8.28% |