XYLG vs. EBNK.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO).
XYLG and EBNK.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020. EBNK.TO is an actively managed fund by Evolve. It was launched on Jan 7, 2022.
Performance
XYLG vs. EBNK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XYLG vs. EBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | -2.15% | 12.93% | 22.31% | 18.16% | -14.89% |
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD | -2.12% | 67.80% | 18.61% | 23.58% | -11.60% |
Different Trading Currencies
XYLG is traded in USD, while EBNK.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the EBNK.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XYLG having a -2.15% return and EBNK.TO slightly higher at -2.12%.
XYLG
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 14.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
EBNK.TO
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 35.25%
- 3Y*
- 32.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XYLG vs. EBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EBNK.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XYLG vs. EBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XYLG
EBNK.TO
XYLG vs. EBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLG | EBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.17 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.81 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.07 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 8.24 | -1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLG | EBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.17 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.68 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLG and EBNK.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XYLG vs. EBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison
XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.65%, more than EBNK.TO's 11.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 14.65% | 13.94% | 23.65% | 4.90% | 6.43% | 7.40% | 1.39% |
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD | 11.47% | 11.05% | 12.56% | 7.32% | 7.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XYLG vs. EBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum EBNK.TO drawdown of -31.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and EBNK.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLG | EBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -31.02% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -17.39% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -7.81% | +3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -7.56% | +3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 4.26% | -2.18% |
Volatility
XYLG vs. EBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) is 4.85%, while Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) has a volatility of 10.15%. This indicates that XYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XYLG | EBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 10.15% | -5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 15.78% | -8.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 30.15% | -13.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 28.82% | -14.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 28.82% | -14.84% |