XYLG vs. COSW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW).

XYLG and COSW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020. COSW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 23, 2025.

Performance

XYLG vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XYLG vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF	-2.15%	3.18%
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	17.85%	-10.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 17.85% return.

XYLG

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -3.11%
• YTD: -2.15%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 14.74%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

COSW

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 17.85%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLG vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COSW's 0.99% expense ratio.

COSW

Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF

XYLG

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF

Return for Risk

XYLG vs. COSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLG

XYLG Risk / Return Rank: 55
XYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLG vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XYLG	COSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XYLG	COSW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.50	+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between XYLG and COSW is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

XYLG vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.65%, more than COSW's 12.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF	14.65%	13.94%	23.65%	4.90%	6.43%	7.40%	1.39%
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	12.19%	4.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XYLG vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, which is greater than COSW's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and COSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	XYLG	COSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.30%	-12.17%	-9.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.84%	-2.74%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-4.04%	-0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XYLG	COSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.74%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.40%	25.26%	-8.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.02%	25.26%	-11.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.98%	25.26%	-11.28%