XYLD.L vs. FLOA.L
XYLD.L (Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D) and FLOA.L (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Corporate Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, from Xtrackers and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XYLD.L returned 1.87%/yr vs 4.28%/yr for FLOA.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XYLD.L charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FLOA.L.
Performance
XYLD.L vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLD.L achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than FLOA.L's 2.04% return.
XYLD.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FLOA.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 5.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD.L vs. FLOA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLD.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D | 0.71% | 6.19% | 4.89% | 5.76% | -8.70% | 0.36% | 10.29% | 17.18% | -1.25% |
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.04% | 4.98% | 6.42% | 6.62% | 1.35% | 0.42% | 0.86% | 4.17% | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD.L and FLOA.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLD.L vs. FLOA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XYLD.L
FLOA.L
XYLD.L vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLD.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 2.07 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 10.50 | -6.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.03 | 55.93 | -40.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLD.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 4.02 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 2.16 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.79 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
XYLD.L vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLD.L drawdown since its inception was -18.93%, which is greater than FLOA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD.L and FLOA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLD.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.93% | -14.96% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.07% | -0.48% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.42% | -1.74% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.38% | -2.53% | -9.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.06% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -0.22% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.09% | +0.19% |
Volatility
XYLD.L vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) at 0.49%. This indicates that XYLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLD.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 0.49% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.56% | 1.13% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01% | 1.24% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.22% | 1.98% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.83% | 4.27% | +1.56% |
XYLD.L vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLD.L has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XYLD.L vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison
XYLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, while FLOA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D | 3.76% | 3.61% | 3.34% | 2.88% | 6.03% | 3.88% | 3.78% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLD.L and FLOA.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XYLD.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XYLD.L and 0.10% for FLOA.L.
Find the right allocation for XYLD.L and FLOA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer