PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XY4P.DE vs. LYS4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XY4P.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XY4P.DE) and Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYS4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XY4P.DE achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly lower than LYS4.DE's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, XY4P.DE has outperformed LYS4.DE with an annualized return of 0.56%, while LYS4.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.21% annualized return.


XY4P.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.56%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
0.27%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
-1.34%
10Y*
0.56%

LYS4.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.09%
1Y
0.59%
3Y*
2.29%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
-0.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XY4P.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XY4P.DE
Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone Yield Plus UCITS ETF
-0.03%1.69%3.52%8.01%-17.35%-2.95%5.93%9.55%-0.61%0.53%
LYS4.DE
Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.05%1.96%2.50%2.85%-5.26%-0.98%-0.68%-0.79%-0.48%-1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XY4P.DE and LYS4.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2012

0.47

Over the past year, XY4P.DE and LYS4.DE have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XY4P.DE vs. LYS4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XY4P.DE
XY4P.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XY4P.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XY4P.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XY4P.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XY4P.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XY4P.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

LYS4.DE
LYS4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
LYS4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYS4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYS4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LYS4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYS4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XY4P.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XY4P.DE) and Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYS4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XY4P.DELYS4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.09

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.44

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

1.30

-1.11

XY4P.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XY4P.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the LYS4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XY4P.DE and LYS4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XY4P.DELYS4.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

0.43

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.16

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

-0.14

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

-0.01

+0.40

Drawdowns

XY4P.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XY4P.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, which is greater than LYS4.DE's maximum drawdown of -9.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XY4P.DE and LYS4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XY4P.DELYS4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.52%

-9.86%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.95%

-1.32%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.07%

-1.32%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-6.58%

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.52%

-9.86%

-10.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.19%

-2.29%

-6.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-2.57%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

0.45%

+0.98%

Volatility

XY4P.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XY4P.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYS4.DE) at 0.46%. This indicates that XY4P.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYS4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XY4P.DELYS4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

0.46%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.88%

1.24%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57%

1.35%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.49%

1.72%

+4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.49%

1.43%

+5.06%

XY4P.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XY4P.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LYS4.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XY4P.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XY4P.DE nor LYS4.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XY4P.DE and LYS4.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XY4P.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XY4P.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for LYS4.DE.

XY4P.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone Yield Plus, while LYS4.DE tracks MTS Mid Price Highest Rated Macro-Weighted 1-3 (EUR). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XY4P.DE and 0.17% for LYS4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XY4P.DE and LYS4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer