PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXTW.L vs. XUT3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXTW.L vs. XUT3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XXTW.L is traded in GBP, while XUT3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUT3.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXTW.L achieves a 24.48% return, which is significantly higher than XUT3.L's 0.92% return.


XXTW.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
12.87%
YTD
24.48%
6M
22.47%
1Y
51.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XUT3.L

1D
0.07%
1M
1.24%
YTD
0.92%
6M
0.26%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
1.54%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXTW.L vs. XUT3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
24.48%13.82%36.21%14.56%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
0.92%-2.42%5.95%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XXTW.L and XUT3.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXTW.L vs. XUT3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXTW.L
XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XUT3.L
XUT3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXTW.L vs. XUT3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXTW.LXUT3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.12

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

0.85

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

2.30

+5.92

XXTW.L vs. XUT3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXTW.L and XUT3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXTW.LXUT3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

0.69

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

0.33

+1.18

Drawdowns

XXTW.L vs. XUT3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXTW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.44%, which is greater than XUT3.L's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXTW.L and XUT3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXTW.LXUT3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.44%

-18.58%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.79%

-5.21%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-8.04%

+5.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-8.22%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

1.92%

+4.51%

Volatility

XXTW.L vs. XUT3.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) at 1.65%. This indicates that XXTW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUT3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXTW.LXUT3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

1.65%

+5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

4.93%

+9.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

6.41%

+12.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

8.22%

+13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

9.43%

+12.05%

XXTW.L vs. XUT3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXTW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XUT3.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XXTW.L vs. XUT3.L - Dividend Comparison

XXTW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUT3.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.84%2.70%2.35%1.80%1.00%2.89%2.43%1.16%1.00%0.69%
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XXTW.L and XUT3.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUT3.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUT3.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XXTW.L.

XXTW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XUT3.L is Government Bonds. XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index, while XUT3.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XXTW.L and 0.06% for XUT3.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXTW.L and XUT3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer