XXTW.L vs. XSHC.L
XXTW.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF) and XSHC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XXTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index, while XSHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XXTW.L returned 10.48%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for XSHC.L. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XXTW.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSHC.L.
Performance
XXTW.L vs. XSHC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XXTW.L is traded in GBP, while XSHC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSHC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XXTW.L achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly higher than XSHC.L's 9.11% return.
XXTW.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- 6M
- 15.65%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- 19.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.50%
XSHC.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| £3.70K | £2.97K | £6.42K | |
| £753.52K | £573.35K | £524.90K |
XXTW.L vs. XSHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XXTW.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF | 14.48% | 13.82% | 36.21% | 21.01% | -30.86% | 29.69% | 43.59% | 48.72% | -7.66% |
XSHC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D | 9.11% | 6.84% | 4.08% | -3.58% | 8.14% | 28.13% | 9.97% | 16.71% | 14.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXTW.L and XSHC.L is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2018 | 0.19 |
The correlation between XXTW.L and XSHC.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXTW.L vs. XSHC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XXTW.L
XSHC.L
XXTW.L vs. XSHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XXTW.L | XSHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 2.10 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.19 | 5.12 | -3.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XXTW.L vs. XSHC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXTW.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than XSHC.L's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXTW.L and XSHC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXTW.L | XSHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -19.16% | -16.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.41% | -12.22% | -22.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.41% | -19.16% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.07% | -19.16% | -16.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.04% | 0.00% | -16.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -4.76% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.85% | 5.01% | +15.84% |
Volatility
XXTW.L vs. XSHC.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) at 5.02%. This indicates that XXTW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXTW.L | XSHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 5.02% | +2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.88% | 11.06% | +5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.65% | 15.32% | +32.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.74% | 14.38% | +17.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.41% | 15.77% | +11.64% |
XXTW.L vs. XSHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXTW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XSHC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XXTW.L vs. XSHC.L - Dividend Comparison
XXTW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSHC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D | 1.15% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.23% | 1.55% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 0.98% |
XXTW.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XXTW.L and XSHC.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSHC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSHC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XXTW.L.
XXTW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XSHC.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index, while XSHC.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XXTW.L and 0.12% for XSHC.L.
Find the right allocation for XXTW.L and XSHC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer