PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXTW.L vs. XS6R.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXTW.L vs. XS6R.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XXTW.L is traded in GBP, while XS6R.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XS6R.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXTW.L achieves a 20.88% return, which is significantly higher than XS6R.L's 14.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XXTW.L has outperformed XS6R.L with an annualized return of 21.21%, while XS6R.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.07% annualized return.


XXTW.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.89%
YTD
20.88%
6M
20.94%
1Y
43.00%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
21.21%

XS6R.L

1D
1.62%
1M
0.78%
YTD
14.66%
6M
15.79%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXTW.L vs. XS6R.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
20.88%13.82%36.21%21.01%-30.86%29.69%43.59%48.72%-4.08%38.72%
XS6R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
14.66%38.34%-1.20%11.55%-3.84%1.17%18.06%22.81%3.52%13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XXTW.L and XS6R.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between XXTW.L and XS6R.L has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXTW.L vs. XS6R.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXTW.L
XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XS6R.L
XS6R.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXTW.L vs. XS6R.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XXTW.LXS6R.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.17

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

9.02

-6.91

XXTW.L vs. XS6R.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXTW.L and XS6R.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XXTW.L vs. XS6R.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXTW.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum XS6R.L drawdown of -57.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXTW.L and XS6R.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXTW.LXS6R.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-57.87%

+21.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.41%

-9.14%

-25.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.41%

-16.65%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.07%

-21.38%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-27.10%

-8.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.35%

-2.97%

-8.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-27.09%

+19.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.43%

3.22%

+17.21%

Volatility

XXTW.L vs. XS6R.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) at 3.31%. This indicates that XXTW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XS6R.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXTW.LXS6R.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.49%

3.31%

+5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.68%

12.85%

+2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.21%

15.02%

+32.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.59%

18.40%

+13.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

18.96%

+8.37%

XXTW.L vs. XS6R.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXTW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XS6R.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XXTW.L vs. XS6R.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXTW.L nor XS6R.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XXTW.L and XS6R.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XS6R.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS6R.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XXTW.L.

XXTW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XS6R.L is Utilities Equities. XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index, while XS6R.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XXTW.L and 0.20% for XS6R.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXTW.L and XS6R.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer