PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXTW.L vs. XLKS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXTW.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XXTW.L is traded in GBP, while XLKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLKS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XXTW.L having a 24.48% return and XLKS.L slightly lower at 24.00%.


XXTW.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
12.87%
YTD
24.48%
6M
22.47%
1Y
51.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLKS.L

1D
-2.35%
1M
12.29%
YTD
24.00%
6M
21.66%
1Y
53.26%
3Y*
33.25%
5Y*
26.60%
10Y*
27.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXTW.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
24.48%13.82%36.21%14.56%
XLKS.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
24.00%15.38%44.20%14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XXTW.L and XLKS.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.97

The correlation between XXTW.L and XLKS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXTW.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXTW.L
XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKS.L
XLKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXTW.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXTW.LXLKS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.20

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

8.18

+0.04

XXTW.L vs. XLKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXTW.L and XLKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXTW.LXLKS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.67

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

1.10

+0.42

Drawdowns

XXTW.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXTW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.44%, roughly equal to the maximum XLKS.L drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXTW.L and XLKS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXTW.LXLKS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.44%

-28.80%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.79%

-16.92%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.83%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-4.71%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

6.63%

-0.20%

Volatility

XXTW.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) is 6.76%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that XXTW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXTW.LXLKS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

7.56%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

15.35%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

20.23%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

23.02%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

22.09%

-0.61%

XXTW.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXTW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XXTW.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXTW.L nor XLKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, XXTW.L and XLKS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XXTW.L.

XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XXTW.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXTW.L and XLKS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer