PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXTW.L vs. XDW0.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXTW.L vs. XDW0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XXTW.L is traded in GBP, while XDW0.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDW0.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXTW.L achieves a 24.48% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.L's 31.44% return.


XXTW.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
12.87%
YTD
24.48%
6M
22.47%
1Y
51.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDW0.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
31.44%
6M
27.91%
1Y
48.84%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXTW.L vs. XDW0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
24.48%13.82%36.21%14.56%
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
31.40%6.49%3.89%-1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XXTW.L and XDW0.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.08

The correlation between XXTW.L and XDW0.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXTW.L vs. XDW0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXTW.L
XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXTW.L vs. XDW0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXTW.LXDW0.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.42

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.40

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

10.88

-2.66

XXTW.L vs. XDW0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXTW.L and XDW0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXTW.LXDW0.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.39

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

0.42

+1.09

Drawdowns

XXTW.L vs. XDW0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXTW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.44%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.L drawdown of -59.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXTW.L and XDW0.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXTW.LXDW0.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.44%

-59.07%

+30.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.79%

-14.30%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-7.68%

+5.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-13.88%

+8.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

4.48%

+1.95%

Volatility

XXTW.L vs. XDW0.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) is 6.76%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that XXTW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXTW.LXDW0.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

7.80%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

17.20%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

20.41%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

23.73%

-2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

25.59%

-4.11%

XXTW.L vs. XDW0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XXTW.L and XDW0.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XXTW.L vs. XDW0.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXTW.L nor XDW0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XXTW.L and XDW0.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XXTW.L and XDW0.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XXTW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XDW0.L is Energy Equities. XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index, while XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXTW.L and XDW0.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer