PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXTW.L vs. DRVE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXTW.L vs. DRVE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XXTW.L is traded in GBP, while DRVE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DRVE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXTW.L achieves a 24.48% return, which is significantly lower than DRVE.L's 40.62% return.


XXTW.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
12.87%
YTD
24.48%
6M
22.47%
1Y
51.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRVE.L

1D
-1.79%
1M
7.67%
YTD
40.62%
6M
37.53%
1Y
89.08%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXTW.L vs. DRVE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
24.48%13.82%36.21%14.56%
DRVE.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
40.62%19.86%-3.40%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XXTW.L and DRVE.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.59

The correlation between XXTW.L and DRVE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXTW.L vs. DRVE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXTW.L
XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

DRVE.L
DRVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXTW.L vs. DRVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXTW.LDRVE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.58

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

8.43

-5.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

23.87

-15.65

XXTW.L vs. DRVE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXTW.L and DRVE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXTW.LDRVE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

3.81

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

0.27

+1.25

Drawdowns

XXTW.L vs. DRVE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXTW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.44%, smaller than the maximum DRVE.L drawdown of -38.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXTW.L and DRVE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXTW.LDRVE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.44%

-38.87%

+10.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.79%

-10.59%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.21%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-17.15%

+12.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

3.75%

+2.68%

Volatility

XXTW.L vs. DRVE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) is 6.76%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) has a volatility of 10.50%. This indicates that XXTW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRVE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXTW.LDRVE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

10.50%

-3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

17.65%

-3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

23.43%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

33.86%

-12.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

33.86%

-12.38%

XXTW.L vs. DRVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXTW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DRVE.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXTW.L vs. DRVE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXTW.L nor DRVE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XXTW.L and DRVE.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XXTW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XXTW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRVE.L.

XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index, while DRVE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XXTW.L and 0.50% for DRVE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXTW.L and DRVE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer