XXRP vs. BSCQ
XXRP (Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Teucrium, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. XXRP is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. Over the past year, XXRP returned -94.75% vs 4.16% for BSCQ. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XXRP charges 1.89%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
XXRP vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XXRP achieves a -77.61% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 2.17% return.
XXRP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- 6M
- -69.14%
- YTD
- -77.61%
- 1Y
- -94.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -84.64%
BSCQ
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.87M | $16.45M | $17.05M | |
| $3.32M | $3.74M | $7.61M |
XXRP vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF | -77.61% | -62.48% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 2.17% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXRP and BSCQ is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXRP vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
XXRP
BSCQ
XXRP vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XXRP | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -17.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 3.45 | -2.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 40.91 | -41.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 180.95 | -182.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XXRP vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXRP drawdown since its inception was -96.66%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXRP and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXRP | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.66% | -16.50% | -80.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.81% | -0.10% | -95.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.46% | -0.03% | -96.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.10% | -2.80% | -61.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 77.28% | 0.02% | +77.26% |
Volatility
XXRP vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) has a higher volatility of 21.60% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.18%. This indicates that XXRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXRP | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.60% | 0.18% | +21.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 100.96% | 0.42% | +100.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 143.28% | 0.59% | +142.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.77% | 3.28% | +139.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.77% | 4.73% | +138.04% |
XXRP vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXRP has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXRP vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
XXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.18%, more than BSCQ's 4.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.08% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF | 29.18% | 6.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XXRP and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XXRP has higher volatility (21.60%) compared to BSCQ (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XXRP dropped -96.66% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.
On 1-year performance, BSCQ leads with 4.16% vs -94.75% for XXRP. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BSCQ has performed better with a 4.16% return vs -94.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XXRP.
XXRP has the higher dividend yield at 29.18%, compared with 4.08% for BSCQ.
XXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.89% for XXRP and 0.10% for BSCQ.
BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.07 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XXRP and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer