XX25.L vs. CBUK.DE
XX25.L (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and CBUK.DE (iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XX25.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while CBUK.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XX25.L returned 13.47%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for CBUK.DE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XX25.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CBUK.DE.
Performance
XX25.L vs. CBUK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XX25.L is traded in GBp, while CBUK.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CBUK.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XX25.L achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly higher than CBUK.DE's 1.76% return.
XX25.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 36.41%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
CBUK.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XX25.L vs. CBUK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XX25.L Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 8.96% | 17.72% | 29.08% | -18.23% | -2.57% |
CBUK.DE iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.76% | 27.35% | 12.91% | -10.85% | 4.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XX25.L and CBUK.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XX25.L and CBUK.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XX25.L vs. CBUK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XX25.L
CBUK.DE
XX25.L vs. CBUK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XX25.L) and iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XX25.L | CBUK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.20 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.10 | 1.06 | +4.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.08 | 2.14 | +12.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XX25.L | CBUK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.11 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.24 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
XX25.L vs. CBUK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XX25.L drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, which is greater than CBUK.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XX25.L and CBUK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XX25.L | CBUK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.20% | -35.65% | -23.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.21% | -23.97% | +16.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.00% | -26.33% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.09% | -12.07% | -3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.23% | -15.83% | -7.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 11.89% | -9.45% |
Volatility
XX25.L vs. CBUK.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XX25.L) is 5.59%, while iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that XX25.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XX25.L | CBUK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 8.17% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 16.22% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 22.88% | -7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.24% | 31.39% | -4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 31.39% | -6.92% |
XX25.L vs. CBUK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XX25.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUK.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XX25.L vs. CBUK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XX25.L nor CBUK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XX25.L and CBUK.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUK.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUK.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XX25.L.
XX25.L is categorized as China Equities, while CBUK.DE is Technology Equities. XX25.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while CBUK.DE tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XX25.L and 0.45% for CBUK.DE.
Find the right allocation for XX25.L and CBUK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer