XWQS.L vs. XDWH.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWQS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L).
XWQS.L and XDWH.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XWQS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select Index. It was launched on Jul 5, 2023. XDWH.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. Both XWQS.L and XDWH.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XWQS.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XWQS.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XWQS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C | -0.78% | 9.12% | 20.95% | -12.78% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.93% | 7.04% | 2.51% | 3.95% |
Different Trading Currencies
XWQS.L is traded in GBP, while XDWH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWH.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWQS.L achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -1.93% return.
XWQS.L
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- 17.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XWQS.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XWQS.L and XDWH.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XWQS.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWQS.L
XDWH.L
XWQS.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWQS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XWQS.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.21 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 0.40 | +1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.05 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 0.52 | +1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 1.03 | +7.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWQS.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.21 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.60 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between XWQS.L and XDWH.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XWQS.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWQS.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XWQS.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWQS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWQS.L and XDWH.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWQS.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -26.24% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.47% | -9.86% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.93% | -6.58% | +1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -4.93% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 3.59% | -1.61% |
Volatility
XWQS.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWQS.L) is 4.41%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that XWQS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XWQS.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 5.27% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 9.62% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 15.97% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 13.78% | +5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 15.46% | +3.51% |