XWQS.L vs. FGQD.L

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XWQS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and FGQD.L (Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XWQS.L is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select Index, while FGQD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Global Quality Income index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XWQS.L returned 7.94%/yr vs 15.81%/yr for FGQD.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XWQS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FGQD.L.

Performance

XWQS.L vs. FGQD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWQS.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XWQS.L is traded in GBP, while FGQD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGQD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWQS.L achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly lower than FGQD.L's 12.33% return.

XWQS.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.71%
• 6M: 8.58%
• YTD: 11.66%
• 1Y: 27.08%
• 3Y*: 7.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FGQD.L

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 2.36%
• 6M: 10.19%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 1Y: 24.65%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWQS.L vs. FGQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XWQS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C	11.66%	9.12%	20.95%	-12.78%
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF	12.33%	12.15%	13.21%	7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XWQS.L and FGQD.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023	0.86

The correlation between XWQS.L and FGQD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XWQS.L vs. FGQD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWQS.L

XWQS.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
XWQS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
XWQS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
XWQS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
XWQS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
XWQS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FGQD.L

FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWQS.L vs. FGQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWQS.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XWQS.L	FGQD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	2.47	-1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	3.46	-2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.45	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.05	3.40	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.56	15.22	-13.66

XWQS.L vs. FGQD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWQS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWQS.L and FGQD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XWQS.L vs. FGQD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWQS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.70%, roughly equal to the maximum FGQD.L drawdown of -26.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWQS.L and FGQD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XWQS.L	FGQD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.70%	-26.43%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.70%	-7.22%	-18.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.70%	-16.90%	-8.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.77%	0.00%	-13.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.31%	-5.59%	-5.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.40%	1.62%	+15.78%

Volatility

XWQS.L vs. FGQD.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWQS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) at 2.77%. This indicates that XWQS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XWQS.L	FGQD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	2.77%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	7.78%	+0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.40%	9.96%	+33.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.27%	12.23%	+18.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.27%	15.42%	+14.85%

XWQS.L vs. FGQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWQS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FGQD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XWQS.L vs. FGQD.L - Dividend Comparison

XWQS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF	1.78%	1.86%	2.31%	2.78%	2.70%	2.46%	2.60%	2.44%	2.70%	1.10%
XWQS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XWQS.L and FGQD.L in my portfolio?

XWQS.L and FGQD.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XWQS.L or FGQD.L?

On fees, XWQS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XWQS.L or FGQD.L?

XWQS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.

What is the main difference between XWQS.L and FGQD.L?

XWQS.L is categorized as ESG, while FGQD.L is Global Equities. XWQS.L tracks MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select Index, while FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWQS.L and 0.40% for FGQD.L.