XWQS.L vs. FASA.L
XWQS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and FASA.L (Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XWQS.L is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select Index, while FASA.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-Share ex Investment Trusts ESG Climate Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XWQS.L returned 18.11%/yr vs 12.75%/yr for FASA.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XWQS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for FASA.L.
Performance
XWQS.L vs. FASA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XWQS.L is traded in GBP, while FASA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FASA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWQS.L achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than FASA.L's 4.29% return.
XWQS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FASA.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XWQS.L vs. FASA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XWQS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 12.26% | 9.12% | 20.95% | -12.78% |
FASA.L Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 4.29% | 21.28% | 9.36% | 2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWQS.L and FASA.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023 | 0.49 |
The correlation between XWQS.L and FASA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWQS.L vs. FASA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWQS.L
FASA.L
XWQS.L vs. FASA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWQS.L) and Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (FASA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XWQS.L | FASA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.24 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 1.43 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.53 | 4.47 | -2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XWQS.L vs. FASA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWQS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.70%, which is greater than FASA.L's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWQS.L and FASA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWQS.L | FASA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.70% | -12.64% | -13.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.70% | -10.95% | -14.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.70% | -12.35% | -13.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.30% | -2.45% | -10.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -3.12% | -8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.48% | 3.50% | +13.98% |
Volatility
XWQS.L vs. FASA.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWQS.L) and Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (FASA.L) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWQS.L | FASA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 3.42% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.49% | 9.94% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.31% | 11.79% | +31.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 13.10% | +17.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 13.10% | +17.10% |
XWQS.L vs. FASA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWQS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FASA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XWQS.L vs. FASA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWQS.L nor FASA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XWQS.L and FASA.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FASA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FASA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWQS.L.
XWQS.L is categorized as ESG, while FASA.L is Europe Equities. XWQS.L tracks MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select Index, while FASA.L tracks FTSE All-Share ex Investment Trusts ESG Climate Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWQS.L and 0.12% for FASA.L.
Find the right allocation for XWQS.L and FASA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer