PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWLD.L vs. JREG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWLD.L vs. JREG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XWLD.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XWLD.L is traded in GBp, while JREG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JREG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XWLD.L having a 10.22% return and JREG.L slightly lower at 9.88%.


XWLD.L

1D
0.06%
1M
5.10%
YTD
10.22%
6M
10.38%
1Y
27.30%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
13.92%

JREG.L

1D
0.14%
1M
4.54%
YTD
9.88%
6M
9.92%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWLD.L vs. JREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XWLD.L
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C
10.22%12.59%21.09%17.58%-8.42%23.71%12.15%23.21%-6.18%
JREG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.88%11.22%20.75%19.41%-7.92%25.50%13.77%23.08%-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XWLD.L and JREG.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.91

The correlation between XWLD.L and JREG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XWLD.L vs. JREG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XWLD.L
JREG.L

Technology

28.3%
28.6%

Financial Services

15.7%
15.4%

Industrials

11.4%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.3%
9.1%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.6%

Energy

4.2%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.3%
3.2%

Utilities

2.7%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.7%

Technology

XWLD.L
28.3%
JREG.L
28.6%

Financial Services

XWLD.L
15.7%
JREG.L
15.4%

Industrials

XWLD.L
11.4%
JREG.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XWLD.L
9.3%
JREG.L
10.1%

Communication Services

XWLD.L
9.3%
JREG.L
9.1%

Healthcare

XWLD.L
8.8%
JREG.L
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

XWLD.L
5.2%
JREG.L
4.6%

Energy

XWLD.L
4.2%
JREG.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

XWLD.L
3.3%
JREG.L
3.2%

Utilities

XWLD.L
2.7%
JREG.L
2.9%

Real Estate

XWLD.L
1.9%
JREG.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWLD.L vs. JREG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWLD.L
XWLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XWLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XWLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

JREG.L
JREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWLD.L vs. JREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XWLD.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWLD.LJREG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.42

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

4.05

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.43

15.89

+0.54

XWLD.L vs. JREG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the JREG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWLD.L and JREG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWLD.LJREG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.28

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.92

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.86

+0.05

Drawdowns

XWLD.L vs. JREG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWLD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, roughly equal to the maximum JREG.L drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWLD.L and JREG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWLD.LJREG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.62%

-25.88%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-6.51%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

-18.75%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.00%

-18.75%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.18%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-3.17%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.66%

0.00%

Volatility

XWLD.L vs. JREG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XWLD.L) is 2.50%, while JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that XWLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWLD.LJREG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

3.26%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

8.75%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

11.57%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

14.39%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.56%

16.18%

-1.62%

XWLD.L vs. JREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWLD.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JREG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XWLD.L vs. JREG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWLD.L nor JREG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XWLD.L and JREG.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XWLD.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWLD.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JREG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XWLD.L and 0.25% for JREG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWLD.L and JREG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer