PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWIS.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XWIS.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XWIS.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XWIS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP
6.42%16.99%14.88%7.34%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
-7.90%14.31%39.50%14.45%
Different Trading Currencies

XWIS.L is traded in GBP, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWIS.L achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than XSTC.L's -7.90% return.


XWIS.L

1D
0.52%
1M
-9.31%
YTD
2.87%
6M
5.77%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XSTC.L

1D
2.97%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
-7.90%
6M
-6.04%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
17.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XWIS.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWIS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XWIS.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWIS.L

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWIS.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWIS.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

1.08

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

1.60

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.42

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.13

3.80

+3.33

XWIS.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWIS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWIS.L and XSTC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWIS.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.08

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.96

+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between XWIS.L and XSTC.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XWIS.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

XWIS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XWIS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.34%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Drawdowns

XWIS.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWIS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.37%, smaller than the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWIS.L and XSTC.L.


Loading graphics...

Volatility

XWIS.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) at 5.21%. This indicates that XWIS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XWIS.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

5.21%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

14.94%

-5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

23.77%

-8.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

22.13%

-8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.48%

22.42%

-8.94%