XWIS.L vs. FSELX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX).

XWIS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Mar 14, 2016. FSELX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985.

Performance

XWIS.L vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XWIS.L vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XWIS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP	6.42%	16.99%	14.88%	7.34%
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	9.21%	41.33%	52.30%	9.01%

Different Trading Currencies

XWIS.L is traded in GBP, while FSELX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FSELX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWIS.L achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 9.21% return.

XWIS.L

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -9.31%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 5.77%
• 1Y: 21.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSELX

• 1D: 6.86%
• 1M: -2.93%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 15.88%
• 1Y: 92.52%
• 3Y*: 43.04%
• 5Y*: 32.78%
• 10Y*: 33.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWIS.L vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWIS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.

FSELX

Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio

XWIS.L

Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP

Return for Risk

XWIS.L vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSELX

FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWIS.L vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XWIS.L	FSELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	2.30	-0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.92	-0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.41	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	5.66	-3.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.13	22.76	-15.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XWIS.L vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWIS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWIS.L and FSELX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XWIS.L	FSELX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	2.30	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.74	+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between XWIS.L and FSELX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XWIS.L vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

XWIS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XWIS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	10.36%	11.11%	7.97%	7.20%	6.69%	6.99%	8.13%	3.36%	26.80%	14.44%	3.82%	15.22%

Drawdowns

XWIS.L vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWIS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.37%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -50.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWIS.L and FSELX.

Volatility

XWIS.L vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) is 5.57%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that XWIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XWIS.L	FSELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	11.67%	-6.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.64%	25.05%	-15.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.52%	41.11%	-25.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.48%	37.17%	-23.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.48%	34.08%	-20.60%