PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWIS.L vs. IISU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XWIS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP
6.42%16.99%14.88%7.34%
IISU.L
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
6.87%11.24%19.29%5.27%
Different Trading Currencies

XWIS.L is traded in GBP, while IISU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IISU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWIS.L achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than IISU.L's 6.87% return.


XWIS.L

1D
3.45%
1M
-6.10%
YTD
6.42%
6M
9.02%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IISU.L

1D
2.80%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
6.87%
6M
8.92%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWIS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XWIS.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWIS.L

IISU.L
IISU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IISU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IISU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IISU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IISU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IISU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWIS.LIISU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

1.37

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

1.92

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.41

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.69

8.41

+1.28

XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWIS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the IISU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWIS.L and IISU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWIS.LIISU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.37

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

0.61

+0.68

Correlation

The correlation between XWIS.L and IISU.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWIS.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWIS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.37%, smaller than the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWIS.L and IISU.L.


Loading graphics...

Volatility

XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) at 5.32%. This indicates that XWIS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IISU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XWIS.LIISU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

5.32%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

9.54%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

16.80%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

15.90%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

18.69%

-5.06%