XWIS.L vs. IISU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L).
XWIS.L and IISU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XWIS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Mar 14, 2016. IISU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. Both XWIS.L and IISU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XWIS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP | 6.42% | 16.99% | 14.88% | 7.34% |
IISU.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.87% | 11.24% | 19.29% | 5.27% |
Different Trading Currencies
XWIS.L is traded in GBP, while IISU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IISU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWIS.L achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than IISU.L's 6.87% return.
XWIS.L
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -6.10%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IISU.L
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- 23.04%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWIS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XWIS.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWIS.L
IISU.L
XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XWIS.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 1.37 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 1.92 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.41 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 8.41 | +1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWIS.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.37 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.61 | +0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between XWIS.L and IISU.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWIS.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWIS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.37%, smaller than the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWIS.L and IISU.L.
Loading graphics...
Volatility
XWIS.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) at 5.32%. This indicates that XWIS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IISU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XWIS.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 5.32% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | 9.54% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.85% | 16.80% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 15.90% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 18.69% | -5.06% |