PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWEM.DE vs. XU61.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWEM.DE achieves a 26.26% return, which is significantly higher than XU61.DE's 12.93% return.


XWEM.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
5.91%
YTD
26.26%
6M
26.51%
1Y
39.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XU61.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
12.93%
6M
13.44%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
7.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XWEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C
26.26%8.67%36.15%-1.01%
XU61.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR
12.93%17.07%10.27%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XWEM.DE and XU61.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023

0.55

The correlation between XWEM.DE and XU61.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWEM.DE vs. XU61.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWEM.DE
XWEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XWEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XWEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

XU61.DE
XU61.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XWEM.DEXU61.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.48

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

4.60

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

17.62

-12.61

XWEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWEM.DE and XU61.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XWEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, smaller than the maximum XU61.DE drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEM.DE and XU61.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWEM.DEXU61.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.80%

-41.19%

+18.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.98%

-5.90%

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-1.52%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-8.86%

+3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.96%

1.55%

+6.41%

Volatility

XWEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) at 3.05%. This indicates that XWEM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XU61.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWEM.DEXU61.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

3.05%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

7.92%

+5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.01%

10.19%

+16.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.76%

11.65%

+10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

14.25%

+7.51%

XWEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XU61.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

XWEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWEM.DE nor XU61.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XWEM.DE and XU61.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XWEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for XU61.DE.

XWEM.DE is categorized as Momentum, while XU61.DE is Global Equities. XWEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Low Carbon SRI Screened Select Index, while XU61.DE tracks ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas Easy. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWEM.DE and 0.31% for XU61.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWEM.DE and XU61.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer