PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWD1.DE vs. XDEQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWD1.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XWD1.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWD1.DE achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than XDEQ.DE's 9.48% return.


XWD1.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.84%
YTD
10.27%
6M
10.70%
1Y
22.28%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*

XDEQ.DE

1D
0.79%
1M
4.30%
YTD
9.48%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.01%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWD1.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XWD1.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D
10.27%6.48%23.90%19.19%-13.65%50.64%
XDEQ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
9.48%2.87%23.81%21.83%-14.94%28.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XWD1.DE and XDEQ.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.96

The correlation between XWD1.DE and XDEQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWD1.DE vs. XDEQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWD1.DE
XWD1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XWD1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWD1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWD1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XWD1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWD1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEQ.DE
XDEQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XDEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWD1.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XWD1.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWD1.DEXDEQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.04

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.26

12.17

+0.09

XWD1.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWD1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the XDEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWD1.DE and XDEQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWD1.DEXDEQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.78

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.80

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.80

+0.21

Drawdowns

XWD1.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWD1.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.05%, smaller than the maximum XDEQ.DE drawdown of -32.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWD1.DE and XDEQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWD1.DEXDEQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

-32.16%

+10.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-6.22%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.05%

-20.59%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.05%

-20.59%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-4.75%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.56%

+0.25%

Volatility

XWD1.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XWD1.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) at 2.36%. This indicates that XWD1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWD1.DEXDEQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.36%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.68%

7.32%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

10.64%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

14.12%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

15.35%

+1.09%

XWD1.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWD1.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XWD1.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWD1.DE nor XDEQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XDEQ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XWD1.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.78%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, XWD1.DE and XDEQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XWD1.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWD1.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEQ.DE.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XWD1.DE and 0.25% for XDEQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWD1.DE and XDEQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer