XWD.TO vs. FGEP.TO
XWD.TO (iShares MSCI World Index ETF) and FGEP.TO (Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF) are both Global Equities funds. XWD.TO is passively managed, while FGEP.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, XWD.TO returned 28.11% vs 33.16% for FGEP.TO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XWD.TO charges 0.48%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for FGEP.TO.
Performance
XWD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWD.TO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than FGEP.TO's 16.78% return.
XWD.TO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 28.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.72%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- 13.55%
FGEP.TO
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 16.78%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 33.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XWD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XWD.TO iShares MSCI World Index ETF | 11.99% | 15.25% | 12.77% |
FGEP.TO Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF | 16.78% | 17.44% | 9.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWD.TO and FGEP.TO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XWD.TO and FGEP.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWD.TO vs. FGEP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XWD.TO
FGEP.TO
XWD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO) and Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XWD.TO | FGEP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.61 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 4.67 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.98 | 19.65 | -4.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWD.TO | FGEP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 3.19 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.78 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
XWD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWD.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.48%, which is greater than FGEP.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWD.TO and FGEP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWD.TO | FGEP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.48% | -14.78% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -7.14% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.66% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -1.64% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 1.69% | +0.19% |
Volatility
XWD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO) is 3.55%, while Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that XWD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGEP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWD.TO | FGEP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 3.81% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 8.34% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.68% | 10.47% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 12.70% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 12.70% | +2.66% |
XWD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWD.TO has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FGEP.TO's 1.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
XWD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Dividend Comparison
XWD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while FGEP.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGEP.TO Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XWD.TO iShares MSCI World Index ETF | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.06% | 1.77% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 1.83% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XWD.TO and FGEP.TO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XWD.TO is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XWD.TO is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for FGEP.TO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for XWD.TO and 1.16% for FGEP.TO.
Find the right allocation for XWD.TO and FGEP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer