PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWD.TO vs. FCIN.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWD.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XWD.TO having a 11.42% return and FCIN.NEO slightly lower at 11.25%.


XWD.TO

1D
-0.47%
1M
6.72%
YTD
11.42%
6M
10.29%
1Y
27.27%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
14.76%
10Y*
13.45%

FCIN.NEO

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.25%
YTD
11.25%
6M
12.58%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWD.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XWD.TO
iShares MSCI World Index ETF
11.42%15.25%22.62%
FCIN.NEO
Fidelity All-International Equity ETF
11.25%28.04%11.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XWD.TO and FCIN.NEO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2024

0.63

The correlation between XWD.TO and FCIN.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

XWD.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XWD.TO
FCIN.NEO

Technology

29.0%
7.2%

Financial Services

15.9%
27.9%

Industrials

11.0%
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.8%

Communication Services

9.1%
8.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
6.8%

Energy

4.1%
6.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.7%

Utilities

2.7%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
7.1%

Technology

XWD.TO
29.0%
FCIN.NEO
7.2%

Financial Services

XWD.TO
15.9%
FCIN.NEO
27.9%

Industrials

XWD.TO
11.0%
FCIN.NEO
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XWD.TO
9.3%
FCIN.NEO
7.8%

Communication Services

XWD.TO
9.1%
FCIN.NEO
8.6%

Healthcare

XWD.TO
8.6%
FCIN.NEO
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

XWD.TO
5.3%
FCIN.NEO
6.8%

Energy

XWD.TO
4.1%
FCIN.NEO
6.1%

Basic Materials

XWD.TO
3.2%
FCIN.NEO
2.7%

Utilities

XWD.TO
2.7%
FCIN.NEO
5.9%

Real Estate

XWD.TO
1.9%
FCIN.NEO
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWD.TO vs. FCIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWD.TO
XWD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XWD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XWD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FCIN.NEO
FCIN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWD.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWD.TOFCIN.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.53

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

9.99

+4.53

XWD.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWD.TO and FCIN.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWD.TOFCIN.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

1.83

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.59

-0.69

Drawdowns

XWD.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWD.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.48%, which is greater than FCIN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWD.TO and FCIN.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWD.TOFCIN.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.48%

-12.34%

-15.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-9.56%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-2.16%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-1.55%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.42%

-0.54%

Volatility

XWD.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO) is 3.61%, while Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that XWD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWD.TOFCIN.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

5.34%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

10.87%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

13.23%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.71%

13.76%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

13.76%

+1.60%

Dividends

XWD.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison

XWD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than FCIN.NEO's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCIN.NEO
Fidelity All-International Equity ETF
1.15%1.28%1.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XWD.TO
iShares MSCI World Index ETF
1.19%1.33%1.19%1.39%1.36%1.21%1.06%1.77%1.94%1.63%1.83%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


XWD.TO and FCIN.NEO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWD.TO and FCIN.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer