XV vs. ARMW
XV (Simplify Target 15 Distribution ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
XV vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XV achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.
XV
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 3.17%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 13.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- 128.75%
- YTD
- 363.23%
- 6M
- 245.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XV vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XV Simplify Target 15 Distribution ETF | 3.17% | 0.95% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 363.23% | -40.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XV and ARMW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.35 |
XV vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XV
ARMW
Financial Services
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
XV
ARMW
-
Technology
XV
ARMW
Communication Services
XV
ARMW
-
Consumer Cyclical
XV
ARMW
-
Healthcare
XV
ARMW
-
Industrials
XV
ARMW
-
Consumer Defensive
XV
ARMW
-
Energy
XV
ARMW
-
Utilities
XV
ARMW
-
Real Estate
XV
ARMW
-
Basic Materials
XV
ARMW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XV vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
XV
ARMW
XV vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Target 15 Distribution ETF (XV) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XV | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XV | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 4.96 | -3.34 |
Drawdowns
XV vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XV drawdown since its inception was -5.73%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XV and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XV | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -48.47% | +42.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | 0.00% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -26.55% | +25.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | — | — |
Volatility
XV vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XV | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.31% | 88.46% | -79.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.77% | 88.46% | -77.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.77% | 88.46% | -77.69% |
XV vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XV vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
XV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.22%, more than ARMW's 15.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 15.20% | 16.38% |
XV Simplify Target 15 Distribution ETF | 19.22% | 13.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XV and ARMW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XV is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XV is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
XV has the higher dividend yield at 19.22%, compared with 15.20% for ARMW.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XV and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for XV and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer