XUU.TO vs. ZCN.TO
XUU.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF) and ZCN.TO (BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while ZCN.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XUU.TO returned 15.46%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for ZCN.TO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUU.TO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ZCN.TO.
Performance
XUU.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUU.TO achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly higher than ZCN.TO's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XUU.TO has outperformed ZCN.TO with an annualized return of 15.46%, while ZCN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.62% annualized return.
XUU.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 23.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.81%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
ZCN.TO
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 34.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.62%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
XUU.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUU.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 12.48% | 11.25% | 34.07% | 23.11% | -13.53% | 25.93% | 16.25% | 23.77% | 2.42% | 12.79% |
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 10.70% | 31.51% | 21.64% | 11.63% | -5.84% | 25.05% | 5.69% | 22.85% | -8.84% | 8.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUU.TO and ZCN.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015 | 0.58 |
The correlation between XUU.TO and ZCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
XUU.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Financial Services
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Communication Services
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Industrials
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Healthcare
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Consumer Defensive
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Energy
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Utilities
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Real Estate
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Basic Materials
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUU.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XUU.TO
ZCN.TO
XUU.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUU.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.50 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 3.75 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.64 | 17.48 | -4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUU.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.76 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.15 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.85 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.68 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
XUU.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, smaller than the maximum ZCN.TO drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUU.TO and ZCN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUU.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.22% | -37.18% | +8.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | -9.30% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.70% | -12.25% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.41% | -16.25% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.22% | -37.18% | +8.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.14% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -4.76% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 1.99% | +0.31% |
Volatility
XUU.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) is 3.29%, while BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that XUU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUU.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 3.49% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 10.31% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 12.66% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 13.09% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 14.99% | +1.60% |
XUU.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUU.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCN.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUU.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison
XUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than ZCN.TO's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUU.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.33% | 1.68% | 1.73% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 1.52% |
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.03% | 2.22% | 2.78% | 3.29% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.24% | 3.13% | 3.16% | 2.71% | 2.84% | 3.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUU.TO and ZCN.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for XUU.TO.
XUU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ZCN.TO is Canada Equities. XUU.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while ZCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XUU.TO and 0.06% for ZCN.TO.
Find the right allocation for XUU.TO and ZCN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer