PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) and iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUU.TO achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly lower than XSMC.TO's 16.67% return.


XUU.TO

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.40%
YTD
12.48%
6M
10.56%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
15.81%
10Y*
15.46%

XSMC.TO

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.55%
YTD
16.67%
6M
13.55%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XUU.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
12.48%11.25%34.07%23.11%-13.53%25.93%16.25%5.47%
XSMC.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF
16.67%0.80%17.06%13.24%-10.56%25.12%8.66%3.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XUU.TO and XSMC.TO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.66

The correlation between XUU.TO and XSMC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUU.TO
XSMC.TO

Technology

37.3%
16.0%

Financial Services

11.2%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
12.9%

Communication Services

9.8%
3.2%

Industrials

8.8%
16.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
3.4%

Energy

3.4%
7.0%

Utilities

2.5%
1.8%

Real Estate

2.2%
7.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
4.6%

Technology

XUU.TO
37.3%
XSMC.TO
16.0%

Financial Services

XUU.TO
11.2%
XSMC.TO
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XUU.TO
9.8%
XSMC.TO
12.9%

Communication Services

XUU.TO
9.8%
XSMC.TO
3.2%

Industrials

XUU.TO
8.8%
XSMC.TO
16.1%

Healthcare

XUU.TO
8.4%
XSMC.TO
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

XUU.TO
4.4%
XSMC.TO
3.4%

Energy

XUU.TO
3.4%
XSMC.TO
7.0%

Utilities

XUU.TO
2.5%
XSMC.TO
1.8%

Real Estate

XUU.TO
2.2%
XSMC.TO
7.4%

Basic Materials

XUU.TO
1.9%
XSMC.TO
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUU.TO
XUU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XUU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

XSMC.TO
XSMC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XSMC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) and iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUU.TOXSMC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.32

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.86

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.64

13.56

-0.92

XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the XSMC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUU.TO and XSMC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUU.TOXSMC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.84

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.43

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.46

+0.41

Drawdowns

XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, smaller than the maximum XSMC.TO drawdown of -37.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUU.TO and XSMC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUU.TOXSMC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.22%

-37.30%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-8.48%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-27.05%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.41%

-27.05%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.44%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-8.09%

+4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.41%

-0.11%

Volatility

XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) is 3.29%, while iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that XUU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSMC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUU.TOXSMC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

4.12%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

11.75%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

17.89%

-5.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

19.58%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

23.30%

-6.71%

XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUU.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XSMC.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUU.TO vs. XSMC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than XSMC.TO's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XSMC.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF
0.99%1.16%1.74%1.00%1.09%1.19%0.78%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUU.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
1.01%1.16%1.02%1.22%1.38%1.01%1.33%1.68%1.73%1.49%1.65%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUU.TO and XSMC.TO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUU.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUU.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XSMC.TO.

XUU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XSMC.TO is Small Cap Blend Equities. XUU.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while XSMC.TO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XUU.TO and 0.22% for XSMC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUU.TO and XSMC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer